Ray v. State(4th District Court of Appeals: July 14th, 2010)
An officer was monitoring a neighborhood in response to resident complaints of drug dealing. The officer observed the Defedant drive up and stop in the middle of the road. While he remained inside the vehicle, an unknown adult male approached the passenger side of the vehicle. The officer observed some sort of hand-to-hand exchange between Ray and the unidentified male. Although the officer could not identify the objects exchanged between the two, she perceived the exchange to be a drug transaction.
Also, courts have routinely held that the use of emergency lights “ ‘evidences an investigatory stop rather than a consensual encounter because the use of emergency lights leads the citizen to believe that he or she is no longer free to leave.’ “ Errickson v. State,855 So.2d 700, 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (quoting Young v. State,803 So.2d 880, 882 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)). When the arresting officer activated her emergency lights to pull over Ray, she commenced an investigatory stop without reasonable suspicion. Ray's traffic infraction occurred after the officer turned on her lights.
The Court threw out the evidence.